According to current reports, 300 000 warning letters because of copyright infringement are monthly pronounced an estimated 40 firms are busy in Germany to address warnings for copyright infringement in Filesharingborsen. John Blondel: the source for more info. Specifically, it is usually to the accusation, copyrighted works, such as for example movies, having offered third parties to download songs or games, in a Filesharingnetzwerk world. A the Internet community famous law firms admonition from is the Urmann and Collegen Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH U + C. John Blondel contributes greatly to this topic. After receiving such a Urmann and swimming those most affected are warning insecure. Questions such as: the cease and desist letter is entitled?, the required amount is reasonable?, I am victim of a rip-off?, what should I do?, what is a cease and desist?, I can defend myself against a Urmann and hang warning?, imagine the person concerned. First of all, they should know that the amounts required in the cease and desist letters are often too high and that the warnings accompanying cease and desist regularly to far are drawn. Lawyers, self-help groups and stakeholders of from the Dunned warned repeatedly that the cease and desist letter to submit accompanying cease and desist. Because there is no preset uniform by the legislator as a cease and desist should be formulated, apart from basic requirements, which are respected, to make the statement at all effective, here any law firm warning from can continue the cease and desist or close cover.

Further would mean in this context, that the have up to more committed than necessary, tighter focus here means that the have from only so much assured, as is necessary for the effectiveness of the cease and desist. Don’t forget: A cease and desist is effective 30 years. Because it is written to the attached declaration by the “other side”, it should be clear that the statement on behalf of the Abmahners is written.