Steele (1985) says that the fashion has more to see with the way for which a style comes after the other, as a species of progression almost ' ' natural' ' that it comes en vogue to the meeting of the particular ditames of the modesty at the time. each time really has, its values, its principles. Exactly not desiring to deny that much of the indumentria and the fashion has finally to show and to enhance the sexual or social attractiveness, in such a way masculine how much feminine, if it cannot omit that many cultures not-Europeans had loaned little or no value to this type of exhibition. Nor if it can deny that variations exist on what it is had as attractive sexual or social enters the cultures value that it. (BARNARD, 2003, P.

90). In accordance with the cultural variations, some parts of the body are displayed more than the others, in order not to call attention for what it is desired to hide. Logically, in the culture modern occidental person, already we are born learning not? to walk bare? , the girls already excessively are forced not to use very short skirts when children, at last, many values of the adults already go being inlaid in the mentality of formation of the form children that these if become the mni-adults had taught who them. 4 COMMUNICATION AND STATUS the fashion, in accordance with Barnard (2003) communicate. Fashion, indumentria and clothes are considered cultural phenomena, ways by which a social order is tried and communicated. In this way, the unifying function of the fashion and the indumentria serves to communicate the affiliation of a social group, as much for that is its members how much for that not it they are. Also the functions of protection, camouflage, modesty and impudicity are forms of somebody to communicate a position in a cultural order and social, as much for the other members of the order the one that belong, how much for that they are it are of it.