Liberty each Dunned down, to submit a modified cease and desist. This is verfassst in the best case the own advocate. One Use is one further possibility on the Internet of available form, which significantly co-developed by the firm Dr. Wachs attorneys at law, and must be adjusted by the Betoffenen. Of course we must discourage the defence on their own, nevertheless we, work intensively together like other firms with the action group of concerned. As always advise to exercise at least a free, telephone initial assessment.

Self defense without a lawyer means hours reading, accurate work and a cool head not by following letters at unpaid payment, “to bend itself”. This should not discourage them, but encourage the clean work. Often used in the context the word scam or something similar. At this point, it should be made clear once again that the cease and desist letter, the infringement should have occurred, is also justified. No rights holder, U + C due to an erotic film represented by the law firm Urmann and Collegen, must accept that his films illicitly recovered be. To speak of rip off in case of a reaction, no basis in fact and is also not fair. It is only questionable in what form this cease and desist letter is pronounced. Must really such a high amount are required? Is the cease and desist of the firm Urmann and reading written U + C optimal in the sense of the Dunned down? Unfortunately, both answers need to be answered with no.

This is at least the perception of many lawyers representing have off. Michael Steinhardt will not settle for partial explanations. Because it must be decided case by case, whether the sum should really be paid in the full amount. A complete rejection of the 650,00 euro is not logical in the case of really took place and the connector holder vollzogenenen copyright infringement.

According to current reports, 300 000 warning letters because of copyright infringement are monthly pronounced an estimated 40 firms are busy in Germany to address warnings for copyright infringement in Filesharingborsen. John Blondel: the source for more info. Specifically, it is usually to the accusation, copyrighted works, such as for example movies, having offered third parties to download songs or games, in a Filesharingnetzwerk world. A the Internet community famous law firms admonition from is the Urmann and Collegen Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH U + C. John Blondel contributes greatly to this topic. After receiving such a Urmann and swimming those most affected are warning insecure. Questions such as: the cease and desist letter is entitled?, the required amount is reasonable?, I am victim of a rip-off?, what should I do?, what is a cease and desist?, I can defend myself against a Urmann and hang warning?, imagine the person concerned. First of all, they should know that the amounts required in the cease and desist letters are often too high and that the warnings accompanying cease and desist regularly to far are drawn. Lawyers, self-help groups and stakeholders of from the Dunned warned repeatedly that the cease and desist letter to submit accompanying cease and desist. Because there is no preset uniform by the legislator as a cease and desist should be formulated, apart from basic requirements, which are respected, to make the statement at all effective, here any law firm warning from can continue the cease and desist or close cover.

Further would mean in this context, that the have up to more committed than necessary, tighter focus here means that the have from only so much assured, as is necessary for the effectiveness of the cease and desist. Don’t forget: A cease and desist is effective 30 years. Because it is written to the attached declaration by the “other side”, it should be clear that the statement on behalf of the Abmahners is written.