"The philosophy of Parmenides is not well understood, but controversy is put into relationship with the philosophy of Heraclitus," according to Heraclitus, it appears that something is and is not at the same time. Since being consists in being still, in flow, in becoming. Parmenides exploring the idea of becoming, flow of change, this idea is that the item is no longer being what it is. To enter into something else; Parmenides. Find it that within the idea of becoming a contradiction logic.

There is this contradiction that the being is, that it is not. Since what is at this time is no longer at this time. It becomes something else. Any view that we have about reality confronts us with a logical contradiction, not put us in front of a being. He says this is absurd Parmenides Parmenides just discovered the principle of logical thought, formulated in these terms and strict categorical: being is, the young people not notice that it is not categorized Parmenides being and nonbeing. If we analyze what the other one is fake true, because what is really false can not become true. Example: three plus three equals six.

Which is false. Three plus three = six. Which is true. If you delete the digits that make up the thousand, we have six. But the very proposition is false. For three plus three is six thousand. If we say the self is not, contradict ourselves. Because being is something, has not been emptied the concept in our minds.