At the end of the way it will be the will of God and not it mine. Example: The United States has a leader of questionable testimony because it has allowed it to God like when the town had to go captive to Babylon. However, that does not mean that we will become accomplices of the disaster the leaders that we chose almost always are the reflection than we are as town and knows it to the Creator. Clarified east point next I suggest you look for your Bible to you and you examine ROM 13. 1-7 These are the three interpretations or exegesis of the subject that have been outlined through the years: 1 – Some Christians think that the state is too corrupt and who therefore they must be related to this less most possible one. Although they are due to hold to the authority are not active part in the decision making in subjects of the state. These Christians abstain from the vote and the participation of the Armed Forces. (I am in that line).

2- Others think that God has given the authority him to the state in certain subjects and the church in others. The Christians can be loyal to both and to participate in ecclesiastical subjects like secular without there is conflict by the separation of powers. (Subject that every day becomes but then in many occasions the interests of the state difficult they hit those of church.) 3 – Some believers think that the Christians have the responsibility to participate actively and to obtain that the state improves. They think that the Christians must take political positions and to choose candidates of high principles morals. Ideally the church and the state have to work together for the improvement of the quality of life. (Ideally. Hopefully those candidates would exist, but we are not deceived.