Also in the procedure of guardianship of rights TD/266/2007 the Spanish Agency of data protection says it should be proclaiming that any citizen who enjoys the status of public figure nor is the subject in fact noticiable of public relevance must resign to support their personal data moving across the network without being able to react and correct illegitimate inclusion thereof in a system of universal communication such as the Internet. If require individual consent of citizens include their personal data on the Internet or require technical mechanisms which would prevent or leaked inconsentida incorporation of personal data could be an unbearable barrier to the free exercise of the freedoms of expression and information by way of prior censorship (which is constitutionally banned), it is not less true that it is spectacularly legitimate that the citizen who is not obliged to submit to the discipline of the exercise of the above-mentioned freedoms (by not be your personal public interest nor, accordingly, contribute their knowledge to forge a public free as basilar democratic State pillar) should enjoy reactive mechanisms covered in law (such as the right of cancellation of personal data) to prevent the secular and universal network maintenance of your information of a personal nature. As a conclusion we can say as a general rule any person should not bear that their personal data are accessible from by life on the Internet as a result of the inclusion of their data in the search engines of reference in this medium. And therefore owe to different circumstances:-the purpose for which these data were published. If this was the notification to the person concerned of a particular administrative act, once made this, and after exercise of possible resources, order deadlines It would be fulfilled, and therefore would not be necessary to the maintenance of these data for its search through search engines. -The condition of public character of the holder of the data, and that the fact is noticiable or of public relevance. Consequently fact or anyone who does not meet these characteristics not should withstand indefinitely the inclusion of their data on the Internet.

But this conclusion in my opinion deserves a critique, and is that the facts are news at a given time, aside from having this character after a while. And in this sense if, after a reasonable time, the news continue appearing through its consideration in the indicated search engines, the affected should try to withdrawal of the information in the media where it appears, or at least should be avoided finding specific data through these search engines. Conscious of the fact that information can not be removed from the official bulletins, the Spanish Agency of data protection proposes the implementation of media technicians who avoid that search engines can find these personal data. They consist of the implementation of programmes norobot.txt. These they do is give instructions to the Web page where the information is located, both own search engines so that it can be indexed.

Consequently programming these codes must be performed both the Web which includes information, such as search engines. In addition search engines should update its cache 1 to this information do not appear. Audea Seguridad de la Informacion. Aurelio J. Martinez Ferre NNTT Law Department 1 increasingly which is accessed for the first time to specific data, this is stored in cache, later attempting to read the same data will be used to information stored in cache, thus saving time of access.