If you already know the reply, he will not have that to manipulate reply he will have considerably bigger admiration in the eyes of the interviewer. 3-) He prevents the error most common. ' ' My bigger weakness is that I am very perfeccionista and have a raised standard more of what I wait of outros.' ' Uh huh. Frankly this annoys the interviewer. It also shows, very clearly, that you live in negation of itself exactly.

Perhaps Ok, you are a perfeccionista and that she can be a very valid weakness. He elaborates of different form. ' ' I to the times lose time in the analysis of my work, that delay can me in others tarefas.' ' This really means the same thing, but it is a honest weakness. Instead of saying, ' ' The people if feel intimidated by me because I am a leader forte' ' she tries ' ' When I am in a leadership paper, to the times I came across myself as being arrogante.' ' Changing its reply to make it to seem as its main weakness he is that being perfect always he will fail. The interviewer really goes to recognize what you are making and you will not be deceiving nobody (except, perhaps, you yourselves). 4-) Either and clearly concise. Not to exaggerate the things. He does not roll.

Not to happen again itself. He does not explain very. If somebody to ask to it on the time, this is not to ask for to explain the internal functioning to it of an atomic clock. The interviewer is looking something very specific and if you to concentrate itself very in the initial part of the reply it goes to lose the chance of really shining in the second part of the reply. 5-) Immediately to follow with good notice. Ok, you already identified its weakness clearly, you it affirmed of concise form and it showed good knowledge of its personal problems.